Prediction of Carlota Martinez Cirez [243rd] vs Marta Soriano Santiago [708th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L L W L L W
Form
W W L W W L W W L LHead-To-Head: Cirez 0 - 0 Santiago
| Cirez | Stats | Santiago |
|---|---|---|
| 33% (5-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (5-4) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 243 | Ranking | 708 |
| 203 | Highest Rank | 578 |
| 24 | Age | 18 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 61% (223-143) | Career Total W/L | 57% (43-32) |
| $11,820 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carlota Martinez Cirez vs Marta Soriano Santiago Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cirez 0 - 0 Santiago
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cirez has won 38.83% of points on their second serve, while Santiago has won 40.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cirez, in recent form, has won 50.47% of their opponent's second serve points, while Santiago has won 58.1%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.14% and 36.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cirez has saved 45.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Santiago has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cirez has won 61.18% of matches played (W/L 52/ 33), with Santiago winning 60% (W/L 15/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cirez has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 207/ 125), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Santiago has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 24/ 15), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 19/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Cirez has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.45% of matches (W/L 51/ 32), where as Santiago has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 12/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cirez has played against opponents with an average rank of 301.89 while Santiago has played against players with an average rank of 64.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cirez has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Santiago has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cirez has converted 48.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Santiago has converted 43.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Carlota Martinez Cirez vs Marta Soriano Santiago Best Odds For The Match
Carlota Martinez Cirez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 0-6 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Alina Charaeva
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
47%
(
45 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
11
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
52%
(
42 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
46 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Yasmine Mansouri
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 2-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sahaja Yamalapalli
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
46%
(
18 of
39)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Akanksha Dileep Nitture
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
13
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Marta Soriano Santiago Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Marta Soriano Santiago
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
45
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marta Soriano Santiago
Player
Alina Nesmianovych
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marta Soriano Santiago
Player
Lou Borez
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Friederike Nolte
Player
Marta Soriano Santiago
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
47%
(
37 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-2 13-11 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marta Soriano Santiago
Player
Lou Borez
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
55%
(
38 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
47 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 4-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Cirez vs Santiago?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Cirez Vs Santiago is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (223/143) | Win/Loss | 57% (43/32) |
| 59% (490/335) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (91/76) |
| 54% (3970/3372) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (803/775) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 140 | Aces Total | 34 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1128 | Total Double Faults | 239 |
| 1:39:54 | Average Match Time | 1:24:34 |
| 320.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 152.23 |
| 65% (13906/21393) | 1st Serve % | 61% (2305/3749) |
| 58% (8045/13906) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (1301/2305) |
| 44% (3279/7487) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (597/1444) |
| 53% (1631/3075) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (252/503) |
| 50% (10694/21488) | Return Points Win % | 48% (1819/3799) |
| 61% (221/362) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (41/73) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (27/48) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 71% (5/7) |
| 54% (51/95) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (12/19) |
| 88% (216/191) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (43/38) |
| 12% (216/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (43/5) |
| 21% (150/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (32/5) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Carlota Martinez Cirez
View full predicted draw for Cirez
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
